newsReddit r/MachineLearningTrust 52 · CommunityPublished 3d agoLive · 2d ago
I reduced image-processing token usage by ~95% compared with GPT-4o direct vision, while maintaining roughly the same accuracy.How significant is that?[P]
I'm testing a new approach for reducing the cost of image-based LLM inference. I evaluated it on the MOMA Graph benchmark , using 1,315 questions . Compared with using GPT-4o to process the original images directly, I observed approximately: ~95% lower token usage roughly the same accuracy as the GPT-4o direct-image baseline I'm intentionally not sharing
Why these links exist
Every edge carries a method, confidence, and the source snippet that justified it — so bad links are debuggable.
- PossiblePossibly related (embedding) · 51%SigLIP-HD by Fine-to-Coarse Supervision →
- PossiblePossibly related (embedding) · 49%kyegomez/VisionMamba →
- PossiblePossibly related (embedding) · 47%Look Less, Think Faster: Joint Token-Compute Adaptation for Multimodal LLMs →
- PossiblePossibly related (embedding) · 47%VisCo: Leveraging Large Language Models as Intrinsic Encoders for Visual Token Compression →
- PossiblePossibly related (embedding) · 46%zwmaronek/Beyond-Early-Exit →
