newsReddit r/MachineLearningTrust 52 · CommunityPublished 9d agoLive · 9d ago
The LLM "know-say gap" looks like a routing problem: you can read a model's confidence from hidden states [P]
My last post was removed - I am not sure why so I have made some edits. A linear probe on a mid-layer hidden state discriminates a model's own correct from incorrect answers at type-2 AUROC ~0.83 to 0.88, across every model I tested (five base models, 7B to 72B, Qwen / Llama / Mistral). On the same items, the model's spoken confidence is close to useless: fine-tuning a model to emit a confidence number lands at ~0.57 to 0.58 type-2 AUROC, near ch
Why these links exist
Every edge carries a method, confidence, and the source snippet that justified it — so bad links are debuggable.
- PossiblePossibly related (embedding) · 46%Evaluate a model properly →
- PossiblePossibly related (embedding) · 46%Evil Spectra: How Optimisers can Amplify or Suppress Emergent Misalignment →
- PossiblePossibly related (embedding) · 51%Two Axes of LLM Abstention: Answer Correctness and Question Answerability →
