Attention Limited Reward Learning
Pairwise human comparisons are a primary interface through which modern AI systems learn human preferences. RLHF and related alignment pipelines typically model such comparisons with Bradley--Terry log-odds, where choice probabilities are governed by latent reward differences. This paper examines what this assumption misses through a reduced-form model motivated by rational inattention, in which each label is generated by a low-capacity evaluation channel. The model separates two forms of ambiguity that standard reward modeling tends to conflate: a comparison may be difficult because the two c
Lineage graph
Paper → model → repo connections mined from source citations (Tier-1 exact match).
Why these links exist
Every edge carries a method, confidence, and the source snippet that justified it — so bad links are debuggable.
- PossiblePossibly related (embedding) · 58%RLHF →
- PossiblePossibly related (embedding) · 45%Comparing the algorithmic fidelity of large language models in predicting human decision making: a case study of vaccination choice - Nature →
- LinkedLinked via arxiv author · 85%Wenqian Xing →
“Attention Limited Reward Learning”
- FuzzySimilar title/name (fuzzy) · 59%aymericdamien/TopDeepLearning →
“Fuzzy title match (0.73): “Attention Limited Reward Learning” ≈ “aymericdamien/TopDeepLearning””
