Augmenting Interviewer Judgments of Patient Experience with Automatic Language Analysis
Understanding how psychiatric patients subjectively experienced a clinical conversation is important for feedback and alliance-related process monitoring. While interviewers form post-session judgments about patient experience, these judgments do not always match patients' self-reports. Automatic approaches for predicting perceived interaction quality from conversation have been proposed, but it remains unclear whether such approaches can complement human judgment rather than simply replicate it. To address this gap, we evaluate a clinician-support framework in which post-session interviewer r
Lineage graph
Paper → model → repo connections mined from source citations (Tier-1 exact match).
Why these links exist
Every edge carries a method, confidence, and the source snippet that justified it — so bad links are debuggable.
- PossiblePossibly related (embedding) · 51%The Parallel Consultation: A Literature Review of Patient Use of Large Language Models and Its Implications for Psychiatric Clinical Decision-Making - Cureus →
- PossiblePossibly related (embedding) · 51%Towards AI-augmented decision making in psychiatry →
- PossiblePossibly related (embedding) · 49%Benchmarking large language models against practicing clinicians on psychopathological assessment - Nature →
- PossiblePossibly related (embedding) · 45%Clinician Use of a General-Purpose Large Language Model in Hospital Medicine: A Mixed-Methods Pilot Study - Cureus →
- PossiblePossibly related (embedding) · 45%Can ChatGPT Be Your Therapist? USC Study Tests AI Responses to Mental Health Questions - USC Viterbi School of Engineering →
- LinkedLinked via arxiv author · 85%Aowen Shi →
“Augmenting Interviewer Judgments of Patient Experience with Automatic Language Analysis”
- LinkedLinked via arxiv author · 85%Michal Balazia →
“Augmenting Interviewer Judgments of Patient Experience with Automatic Language Analysis”
- LinkedLinked via arxiv author · 85%Danilo Postin →
“Augmenting Interviewer Judgments of Patient Experience with Automatic Language Analysis”