Can Agents Generalize to the Open World? Unveiling the Fragility of Static Training in Tool Use
While Large Language Model (LLM) agents demonstrate proficiency in static benchmarks, their deployment in real-world scenarios is hindered by the dynamic nature of user queries, tool sets, and interaction dynamics. To address this generalization gap, we formalize OpenAgent (Tool-Use Agent in Open-World), a problem setting characterized by distributional shifts across query, action, observation, and domain dimensions. To systematically diagnose its impact, we construct a controlled sandbox environment where we define fine-grained environmental shifts across a four-tier hierarchy, Perception, In
Lineage graph
Paper → model → repo connections mined from source citations (Tier-1 exact match).
Why these links exist
Every edge carries a method, confidence, and the source snippet that justified it — so bad links are debuggable.
- LinkedLinked via unknownagent-tools →
- LinkedLinked via unknownOpen-source agent framework crosses 50k stars →
- LinkedLinked via unknownAgentCore-8B →
- LinkedLinked via unknownScarfBench: Benchmarking AI Agents for Enterprise Java Framework Migration →
- LinkedLinked via unknownIs it agentic enough? Benchmarking open models on your own tooling →
- PossiblePossibly related (embedding) · 56%BoundaryML/baml →
- PossiblePossibly related (embedding) · 46%bug-ops/zeph →
- LinkedLinked via arxiv author · 85%Song-Lin Lv →
“Can Agents Generalize to the Open World? Unveiling the Fragility of Static Training in Tool Use”
