Cheap Code, Costly Judgment: A Case Study on Governable Agentic Software Engineering
Generative AI is shifting software engineering from a practice organized around scarce implementation effort toward one organized around abundant, low-cost code production. This shift changes the central engineering problem: not whether AI can generate useful code, but how engineers organize architectures, tools, evidence, and feedback loops so that AI-mediated development remains inspectable, correctable, and maintainable. We study this problem through a first-person case study: a 12-week development effort in which a single expert software engineer used frontier AI coding agents to build a
Lineage graph
Paper → model → repo connections mined from source citations (Tier-1 exact match).
Why these links exist
- Linked via arxiv authorJames C. Davis →
Cheap Code, Costly Judgment: A Case Study on Governable Agentic Software Engineering
- Linked via arxiv authorPaschal C. Amusuo →
Cheap Code, Costly Judgment: A Case Study on Governable Agentic Software Engineering
- Linked via arxiv authorTanmay Singla →
Cheap Code, Costly Judgment: A Case Study on Governable Agentic Software Engineering
- Linked via arxiv authorBerk Çakar →
Cheap Code, Costly Judgment: A Case Study on Governable Agentic Software Engineering
- Linked via arxiv authorKirsten A. Davis →
Cheap Code, Costly Judgment: A Case Study on Governable Agentic Software Engineering
