Coding-agents can replicate scientific machine learning papers
Scientific machine learning papers typically make computational claims, e.g., that the relative mean square error is less than 5% or that the 95% predictive credible interval covers the test data. A coding agent can be prompted to replicate those claims from paper materials alone, but the prompt does not by itself reliably preserve progress or check whether generated evidence supports the paper's claims. We introduce Paper-replication, a workflow that makes each selected paper claim a target with recorded evidence, and implement it as a coding-agent skill. The workflow makes the agent record t
Lineage graph
Paper → model → repo connections mined from source citations (Tier-1 exact match).
Why these links exist
Every edge carries a method, confidence, and the source snippet that justified it — so bad links are debuggable.
- PossiblePossibly related (embedding) · 47%Google's Agentic Peer-Reviewer Handled ~10K Papers at ICML/STOC — Formal Research Paper Now Out [R] →
- PossiblePossibly related (embedding) · 47%REAP: Automatic Curation of Coding Agent Benchmarks from Interactive Production Usage [R] →
- PossiblePossibly related (embedding) · 46%replicate/cog →
- LinkedLinked via arxiv author · 85%Atharva Hans →
“Coding-agents can replicate scientific machine learning papers”
- LinkedLinked via arxiv author · 85%Ilias Bilionis →
“Coding-agents can replicate scientific machine learning papers”
- PossiblePossibly related (embedding) · 55%Reproducibility in Computational Biology: Best Practices for AI and ML Workflows - Technology Networks →
- PossiblePossibly related (embedding) · 45%Interactive Proofs for General Distribution Properties - Apple Machine Learning Research →
