Competitive Market Behavior of LLMs
Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed as economic agents, yet there is little evidence whether LLM agents are suited for participating in market mechanisms designed for humans, and whether these mechanisms deliver desired outcomes when faced with LLM agents. We address this question by replicating seminal economic experiments, replacing human subjects with LLM agents. We place agents in a double auction environment, which is a widely-used market mechanism. We check whether such a market is able to deliver an efficient allocation of resources, thereby testing a novel dimension
Lineage graph
Paper → model → repo connections mined from source citations (Tier-1 exact match).
Why these links exist
Every edge carries a method, confidence, and the source snippet that justified it — so bad links are debuggable.
- PossiblePossibly related (embedding) · 55%AI can’t simulate human preferences - new study tests LLMs against thousands of real users →
- LinkedLinked via arxiv author · 85%Pawel Struski →
“Competitive Market Behavior of LLMs”
- LinkedLinked via arxiv author · 85%Jakub Swistak →
“Competitive Market Behavior of LLMs”
- LinkedLinked via arxiv author · 85%Inez Okulska →
“Competitive Market Behavior of LLMs”
- LinkedLinked via arxiv author · 85%Przemyslaw Biecek →
“Competitive Market Behavior of LLMs”
