Dataset Biases and Shortcut Learning in Motion-Based AI-Generated Video Detection
The visual quality of AI-generated videos has improved drastically in recent years, making it increasingly difficult for humans to distinguish between real and synthetic media. In this work, we evaluate the robustness and applicability of four state-of-the-art motion-based AI-generated video detectors. We identify significant preprocessing and sampling biases in these methods and demonstrate that they account for a substantial portion of their reported performance. Furthermore, we find that these detectors are highly sensitive to motion patterns specific to their evaluation datasets, where AI-
Lineage graph
Paper → model → repo connections mined from source citations (Tier-1 exact match).
Why these links exist
Every edge carries a method, confidence, and the source snippet that justified it — so bad links are debuggable.
- LinkedLinked via unknownmrreviewai/ai-tools-for-content-creators →
- PossiblePossibly related (embedding) · 28%voxel51/fiftyone →
“Possibly related via embedding similarity 0.55 (not asserted). Timestamp check: artifact after paper (+1d).”
- PossiblePossibly related (embedding) · 48%VideoFlexTok: Flexible-Length Coarse-to-Fine Video Tokenization - Apple Machine Learning Research →
- PossiblePossibly related (embedding) · 46%biasvariancelabs/aitlas →
- PossiblePossibly related (embedding) · 54%FennelFetish/qapyq →
- PossiblePossibly related (embedding) · 49%Reelful’s AI turns your camera roll into short-form videos for social media →
