Evidence-Informed LLM Beliefs for Continual Scientific Discovery
Open-ended scientific discovery with large language models (LLMs) increasingly operates as a long-horizon loop of hypothesis search and verification, where a reward signal guides which hypotheses to test next. A notable recent example is AutoDiscovery, which uses "Bayesian surprise" - the belief shift an LLM undergoes after observing evidence for a hypothesis - as both a discovery metric and a reward for search. We first observe that AutoDiscovery treats surprisal as a static quantity, while surprisal in human reasoning is non-stationary - it is defined relative to beliefs that evolve with exp
Lineage graph
Paper → model → repo connections mined from source citations (Tier-1 exact match).
Why these links exist
Every edge carries a method, confidence, and the source snippet that justified it — so bad links are debuggable.
- LinkedLinked via unknownRetrieval is underrated →
- LinkedLinked via unknownRetrace-1.5B →
- PossiblePossibly related (embedding) · 45%TuringLang/Turing.jl →
- PossiblePossibly related (embedding) · 45%Designing a Persistent Knowledge Layer That Refuses to Guess - Towards Data Science →
