Falsification, Not Exposure: An Internally Preregistered Placebo-Controlled Decomposition of Self-Repair Feedback in Frozen Small Code Models
In deployment settings where retraining is infeasible, small frozen code models are routinely asked to repair a failed program after seeing their own failing output, usually treated as a retry mechanism. From a Popperian view, a generated program is a conjecture and a test-execution violation is an oracle-relative, executable counterexample, so feedback's value should be attributed not to re-exposure to failing code but to whether the conjecture is opened to external, executable criticism. As the third stage of a falsification-centered measurement program, this study builds a placebo-controlle
Lineage graph
Paper → model → repo connections mined from source citations (Tier-1 exact match).
Why these links exist
Every edge carries a method, confidence, and the source snippet that justified it — so bad links are debuggable.
- LinkedLinked via unknownRetrace-1.5B →
- PossiblePossibly related (embedding) · 49%FailproofAI/failproofai →
- PossiblePossibly related (embedding) · 47%ndcorder/outputguard →
- FuzzySimilar title/name (fuzzy) · 59%mangiucugna/json_repair →
“Fuzzy title match (0.73): “Falsification, Not Exposure: An Internally Preregistered Pla” ≈ “mangiucugna/json_repair””
