FLY-EVAL++: An Evidence-Driven Evaluation Protocol for Safety-Constrained Flight Prediction with Large Language Models
Evaluating large language models (LLMs) in safety-critical, physics-governed environments requires more than accuracy-based metrics, because predictions that are numerically close to the ground truth can still violate operational constraints, combine fields in physically inconsistent ways, or fail to produce usable structured outputs. Existing evaluation protocols do not measure these failure modes reliably. We propose FLY-EVAL++, an evidence-driven evaluation protocol that combines deterministic verification of protocol compliance, physical feasibility, and safety constraints with fixed rubri
Lineage graph
Paper → model → repo connections mined from source citations (Tier-1 exact match).
Why these links exist
Every edge carries a method, confidence, and the source snippet that justified it — so bad links are debuggable.
- PossiblePossibly related (embedding) · 51%Safety and alignment in an era of long-horizon models →
- FuzzyOverlapping authors or contributors · 62%bytedance/deer-flow →
“Shared author/contributor keys: wang”
- FuzzyOverlapping authors or contributors · 62%mudler/LocalAI →
“Shared author/contributor keys: guo”
- FuzzyOverlapping authors or contributors · 62%modular/modular →
“Shared author/contributor keys: liu”
- FuzzyOverlapping authors or contributors · 62%ray-project/ray →
“Shared author/contributor keys: wang”
