Grokipedia vs Wikipedia: An LLM-Based Audit of Political Neutrality along Ideologies
Online encyclopedias shape political opinion and, through it, democratic discourse. In late 2025, Grokipedia was released, an encyclopedia written entirely by the LLM Grok. One motivation behind the project was to provide an unbiased alternative to Wikipedia, which has faced accusations of "left-wing" and "liberal" bias. But does an encyclopedia written by an LLM deliver greater neutrality, or does it simply embed a different ideology? We conduct a large-scale political bias study on Grokipedia and Wikipedia, analysing 1,394 article pairs describing members of government for neutrality along n
Lineage graph
Paper → model → repo connections mined from source citations (Tier-1 exact match).
Why these links exist
Every edge carries a method, confidence, and the source snippet that justified it — so bad links are debuggable.
- LinkedLinked via arxiv author · 85%Filippos Vlahos →
“Grokipedia vs Wikipedia: An LLM-Based Audit of Political Neutrality along Ideologies”
- LinkedLinked via arxiv author · 85%Guillaume Bied →
“Grokipedia vs Wikipedia: An LLM-Based Audit of Political Neutrality along Ideologies”
- LinkedLinked via arxiv author · 85%Tijl De Bie →
“Grokipedia vs Wikipedia: An LLM-Based Audit of Political Neutrality along Ideologies”