How Anthropomorphic Language Impacts Public Perceptions of AI
Public discourse about artificial intelligence (AI) often uses anthropomorphic language: language that attributes human capabilities and characteristics to the system. This practice has been criticized for setting misleading expectations, inflating claims, and fueling hype around AI, which may distort public understanding of AI and impact policy priorities. We study the effects of anthropomorphic framing by comparing changes in participants' perceptions (N=815) when reading passages with and without anthropomorphic language, designed to reflect realistic public-facing AI discourse. We further
Lineage graph
Paper → model → repo connections mined from source citations (Tier-1 exact match).
Why these links exist
Every edge carries a method, confidence, and the source snippet that justified it — so bad links are debuggable.
- LinkedLinked via unknownIt’s not about Anthropic vs. OpenAI anymore →
- LinkedLinked via unknownAnthropic Thinks Its Own Success Is Key to Making AI Safe →
- LinkedLinked via unknownThree things to watch amid Anthropic’s latest feud with the government →
- LinkedLinked via unknownWhy Aren’t We Measuring How AI Affects Humans? →
- LinkedLinked via unknownAnthropic Added a New Security Measure to Get Back Into the Trump Administration’s Good Graces →
- LinkedLinked via unknownAfter spooking Trump into safety testing, Anthropic AI models get global release →
- PossiblePossibly related (embedding) · 46%Work in the Age of AI: Reflections from After Neoliberalism - Ash Center →
- PossiblePossibly related (embedding) · 47%Can AI Avatars Change How We Perceive Information? (Academic Research) →
