Read original ↗
paperarXivTrust 82 · PrimaryPublished 1mo agoLive · 1mo ago

How Surprising Is Historical Italian to Language Models? Tokenization Tax, Comprehension Tax, and a Simple Mitigation

Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly critical to digital library workflows, yet their ability to process historical language remains poorly understood. Historical difficulty is typically treated as a monolithic barrier, conflating orthographic variation, linguistic distance, and pretraining exposure. In this paper, we propose a diagnostic framework that decomposes this difficulty into four distinct dimensions: tokenization cost, predictive uncertainty (surprisal), semantic robustness, and context sensitivity. We evaluate this framework on three datasets spanning three centuries: (1)

Lineage graph

Paper → model → repo connections mined from source citations (Tier-1 exact match).

Why these links exist

Every edge carries a method, confidence, and the source snippet that justified it — so bad links are debuggable.

Covers

Implements

Related to

Covers (incoming)

Implements (incoming)

Related across the graph

Topics