Improving LLM-Generated Process Model Quality Through Reinforcement Learning: The Role of Reward Function Design
Large language models (LLMs) can generate BPMN process models from natural-language descriptions, yet supervised fine-tuning (SFT) limits their output quality to the patterns present in the training data. Reinforcement learning (RL) can optimize beyond this ceiling using external quality measures, but how the reward function should be designed when quality is multi-dimensional remains unexplored. We present a systematic investigation of reward function design for RL-based process model generation, training two LLM families (Llama~3.1 8B, Qwen~2.5 14B) under 48 configurations using Group Sequen
Lineage graph
Paper → model → repo connections mined from source citations (Tier-1 exact match).
Why these links exist
Every edge carries a method, confidence, and the source snippet that justified it — so bad links are debuggable.
- PossiblePossibly related (embedding) · 49%rllm-org/rllm →
- PossiblePossibly related (embedding) · 47%AgileRL/AgileRL →
- PossiblePossibly related (embedding) · 47%teilomillet/retrain →
- PossiblePossibly related (embedding) · 46%IEEE Rolls Out Large Language Models Virtual Training Course →
- LinkedLinked via arxiv author · 85%Alexander Rombach →
“Improving LLM-Generated Process Model Quality Through Reinforcement Learning: The Role of Reward Function Design”
- LinkedLinked via arxiv author · 85%Chantale Lauer →
“Improving LLM-Generated Process Model Quality Through Reinforcement Learning: The Role of Reward Function Design”
- LinkedLinked via arxiv author · 85%Nijat Mehdiyev →
“Improving LLM-Generated Process Model Quality Through Reinforcement Learning: The Role of Reward Function Design”
- FuzzySimilar title/name (fuzzy) · 59%aymericdamien/TopDeepLearning →
“Fuzzy title match (0.73): “Improving LLM-Generated Process Model Quality Through Reinfo” ≈ “aymericdamien/TopDeepLearning””
