Inside the Unfair Judge: A Mechanistic Interpretability Account of LLM-as-Judge Bias
Existing studies of LLM-as-judge scoring bias work predominantly at the input-output level: they perturb inputs, measure score deltas, and propose prompt-level mitigations. We argue that the same biases admit a representation-level account in the judge's hidden state, complementary to the input-output view and operationally useful in ways it does not afford. We report three findings, across seven judges, seven bias types, and nine benchmarks. Geometry: baseline judging inputs occupy a tight activation manifold while biased inputs are displaced along a low-dimensional, type-specific subspace th
Lineage graph
Paper → model → repo connections mined from source citations (Tier-1 exact match).
Why these links exist
Every edge carries a method, confidence, and the source snippet that justified it — so bad links are debuggable.
- PossiblePossibly related (embedding) · 48%variii/llm-as-a-judge →
- LinkedLinked via arxiv author · 85%Zixiang Xu →
“Inside the Unfair Judge: A Mechanistic Interpretability Account of LLM-as-Judge Bias”
- LinkedLinked via arxiv author · 85%Sixian Li →
“Inside the Unfair Judge: A Mechanistic Interpretability Account of LLM-as-Judge Bias”
- LinkedLinked via arxiv author · 85%Huaxing Liu →
“Inside the Unfair Judge: A Mechanistic Interpretability Account of LLM-as-Judge Bias”
- LinkedLinked via arxiv author · 85%Zhixiang Wang →
“Inside the Unfair Judge: A Mechanistic Interpretability Account of LLM-as-Judge Bias”
- LinkedLinked via arxiv author · 85%Shuai Li →
“Inside the Unfair Judge: A Mechanistic Interpretability Account of LLM-as-Judge Bias”
- LinkedLinked via arxiv author · 85%Zirui Song →
“Inside the Unfair Judge: A Mechanistic Interpretability Account of LLM-as-Judge Bias”
