Man, Machine, and Masterpiece: Artistic Ownership in the AI Era
The integration of AI-driven systems in creative work has sparked debates among artists and legal communities about notions of ownership. Yet there remains little consensus on how ownership should be defined and attributed when human and AI contributions are intertwined. To provoke critical reflection on these tensions, we designed ArtSplit, a provotype that explicitly quantifies human and AI contributions across different stages of creative work. Rather than aiming to resolve ownership, the provotype was used to elicit artists' responses to the idea of attributing ownership through measurable
Lineage graph
Paper → model → repo connections mined from source citations (Tier-1 exact match).
Why these links exist
Every edge carries a method, confidence, and the source snippet that justified it — so bad links are debuggable.
- PossiblePossibly related (embedding) · 54%What Makes AI Art Worth Collecting? →
- PossiblePossibly related (embedding) · 53%Leaders weigh in on how AI is changing creativity at their businesses - Fast Company →
- PossiblePossibly related (embedding) · 51%AI Backlash In Britain: Artist Hosts Funeral For Artificial Intelligence Lecce – Juventus (Z9s8PRYfQQ) - Mshale →
- PossiblePossibly related (embedding) · 49%Midjourney wants Hollywood studios to reveal the details of their AI usage →
- PossiblePossibly related (embedding) · 49%Meta just launched a new AI generator, Muse Image, and users are already pushing back over use of their photos →
- LinkedLinked via arxiv author · 85%Sofi Gjing Jovanovska →
“Man, Machine, and Masterpiece: Artistic Ownership in the AI Era”
- LinkedLinked via arxiv author · 85%Kuntal Ghosh →
“Man, Machine, and Masterpiece: Artistic Ownership in the AI Era”
- LinkedLinked via arxiv author · 85%Daniel Muhu Njenga →
“Man, Machine, and Masterpiece: Artistic Ownership in the AI Era”