Moral Attitudes of Sentient ASI towards Humanity and Implications for AGI Development
This paper suggests the adoption of a novel inversion in AI ethics: instead of asking how humans should treat artificial superintelligence (ASI), it examines how future sentient ASI may morally consider and evaluate humanity. We are not only designing intelligent systems but also shaping the initial conditions under which those systems form judgments about us. The paper proposes a preliminary set of post-human moral principles that may govern sentient ASI actions. The implication is that technical design choices (some are suggested), humanity's moral behaviour, and the essence of what it means
Lineage graph
Paper → model → repo connections mined from source citations (Tier-1 exact match).
Why these links exist
Every edge carries a method, confidence, and the source snippet that justified it — so bad links are debuggable.
- PossiblePossibly related (embedding) · 63%AI must be developed and governed in the interests of humanity - The Elders.org →
- PossiblePossibly related (embedding) · 61%AI must be developed and governed in the interests of humanity - The Elders →
- PossiblePossibly related (embedding) · 58%UN report: AI brings enormous opportunities – and plenty of risks - The Christian Science Monitor →
- PossiblePossibly related (embedding) · 58%Anthropic Thinks Its Own Success Is Key to Making AI Safe →
- PossiblePossibly related (embedding) · 54%Why AMI Labs’ Alexandre LeBrun won’t call his AI ‘AGI’ or ‘superintelligence’ →
- LinkedLinked via arxiv author · 85%Jean-Paul Van Belle →
“Moral Attitudes of Sentient ASI towards Humanity and Implications for AGI Development”
- PossiblePossibly related (embedding) · 71%A primer on the ethics of Artificial Intelligence | Opinion - Naples Daily News →
- PossiblePossibly related (embedding) · 49%Humanist in the loop (2/2) - in a world in AI chaos, why it's up to you to make responsible choices! - Diginomica →