Moral Safety in LLMs: Exposing Performative Compliance with Puzzled Cues
As large language models take on morally consequential roles in healthcare, legal, and hiring contexts, we need to examine whether their ethical behaviors are genuine or superficial. We show that current fairness evaluations substantially overestimate moral safety. Models appear fair when demographic identity is stated as an explicit label, yet become measurably less fair when the same identity must be inferred. We term this failure \emph{performative compliance}, where a model is fair when the presentation resembles a fairness evaluation and less fair as that cue weakens. We introduce a cue-v
Lineage graph
Paper → model → repo connections mined from source citations (Tier-1 exact match).
Why these links exist
Every edge carries a method, confidence, and the source snippet that justified it — so bad links are debuggable.
- PossiblePossibly related (embedding) · 49%Large language models often prioritize Western moral values, overlooking other cultures - The Conversation →
- PossiblePossibly related (embedding) · 50%Are LLMs Stifling Political Speech? An Assessment of How AI Models Protect Free Expression - The Oversight Board →
