Prediction Sets for Counterfactual Decisions: Coverage, Optimality, and Conformal Prediction
Predictions are increasingly used to guide high-stakes decisions, from treatment selection to policy making. To ensure reliability with imperfect predictions, uncertainty quantification methods such as conformal prediction build prediction sets with coverage guarantees. However, statistical validity alone does not immediately determine the decisions to take, nor the optimality thereof. This gap is especially delicate in counterfactual settings where the outcome that materializes depends on the action taken, so uncertainty cannot be specified independently of the decision rule. We develop a d
Lineage graph
Paper → model → repo connections mined from source citations (Tier-1 exact match).
Why these links exist
Every edge carries a method, confidence, and the source snippet that justified it — so bad links are debuggable.
- LinkedLinked via arxiv author · 85%Yurui Zheng →
“Prediction Sets for Counterfactual Decisions: Coverage, Optimality, and Conformal Prediction”
- LinkedLinked via arxiv author · 85%Ying Jin →
“Prediction Sets for Counterfactual Decisions: Coverage, Optimality, and Conformal Prediction”