Regime-Conditional Verification: Correctness Estimation for Adapting and Monitoring Safety Classifiers
Safety classifiers deployed with large language models often fail for two reasons: their decisions reflect the policy learned during training rather than the deployer's desired policy, and their performance degrades as deployment traffic evolves. We present Regime-Conditional Verification (RCV), a lightweight wrapper that adapts an off-the-shelf safety classifier without retraining it. RCV estimates, from the classifier's internal representations, the probability that each prediction disagrees with the deployer's policy, and selectively corrects predictions likely to be wrong. The same correct
Lineage graph
Paper → model → repo connections mined from source citations (Tier-1 exact match).
Why these links exist
Every edge carries a method, confidence, and the source snippet that justified it — so bad links are debuggable.
- PossiblePossibly related (embedding) · 51%Safety and alignment in an era of long-horizon models →
- PossiblePossibly related (embedding) · 49%Understanding Annotator Safety Policy with Interpretability - Apple Machine Learning Research →
- PossiblePossibly related (embedding) · 47%What does "Safe AI" look like? [D] →
- LinkedLinked via arxiv author · 85%Thiago Sandoval →
“Regime-Conditional Verification: Correctness Estimation for Adapting and Monitoring Safety Classifiers”
- LinkedLinked via arxiv author · 85%Ufuk Topcu →
“Regime-Conditional Verification: Correctness Estimation for Adapting and Monitoring Safety Classifiers”
