Reinforcement Learning with Metacognitive Feedback Elicits Faithful Uncertainty Expression in LLMs
Metacognition is a critical component of intelligence that describes the ability to monitor and regulate one's own cognitive processes. Yet LLMs exhibit systemic deficiencies in key metacognitive faculties: they hallucinate with high confidence, fail to recognize knowledge boundaries, and misrepresent their internal uncertainty--undermining trustworthiness and reliability. Since monitoring task performance and adapting behavior accordingly are central to metacognition, we posit that models capable of accurately judging their own performance are better positioned to improve it. We operationaliz
Lineage graph
Paper → model → repo connections mined from source citations (Tier-1 exact match).
Why these links exist
Every edge carries a method, confidence, and the source snippet that justified it — so bad links are debuggable.
- PossiblePossibly related (embedding) · 49%Amirhosein-gh98/Gnosis →
- FuzzySimilar title/name (fuzzy) · 59%aymericdamien/TopDeepLearning →
“Fuzzy title match (0.73): “Reinforcement Learning with Metacognitive Feedback Elicits F” ≈ “aymericdamien/TopDeepLearning””
- PossiblePossibly related (embedding) · 68%Reinforcement Learning With Metacognitive Feedback Is Offered As A Next-Gen Way To Shape AI LLMs - Forbes →
