Selective Memory Retention for Long-Horizon LLM Agents
When does retention matter for memory-augmented LLM agents? We study this with TraceRetain, a lightweight framework for bounded external memory in frozen LLM agents that scores entries by interpretable features (success, age, access frequency, redundancy, specificity, similarity, downstream utility) and evicts the lowest-scoring ones at capacity. On clean ALFWorld with gpt-5-mini, external memory robustly improves over no memory across two seeds, but differences among bounded retention policies fall within Wilson 95% CIs: clean ALFWorld at T=100 to T=200 does not naturally exhibit the memory p
Lineage graph
Paper → model → repo connections mined from source citations (Tier-1 exact match).
Why these links exist
Every edge carries a method, confidence, and the source snippet that justified it — so bad links are debuggable.
- LinkedLinked via unknownlas7/memharness →
- LinkedLinked via unknownNoshkoto/Noshy →
- LinkedLinked via unknownEvaluating long-term memory limits in stateless LLM chatbots — feedback needed [D] →
- LinkedLinked via unknownNew Server Hopes to Break Through AI’s “Memory Wall” →
- LinkedLinked via unknownagent-tools →
- PossiblePossibly related (embedding) · 33%MemTensor/MemOS →
“Possibly related via embedding similarity 0.64 (not asserted). Timestamp check: artifact after paper (+5d).”
