Self-Referential Induction Increases Response Instability Relative to Unresolvable and Verifiable Questions in Large Language Models
Self-referential prompting has been shown to reliably induce large language models to produce first-person reports resembling subjective experience, but no prior work measures how consistent these reports are across repeated, independent trials, or how that consistency compares to the model's behavior on other kinds of open-ended questions. We measure response instability, defined as one minus the mean pairwise cosine similarity of sentence embeddings computed over a compressed core claim extracted from each response, for three groups of questions: self-referential prompts eliciting a subjecti
Lineage graph
Paper → model → repo connections mined from source citations (Tier-1 exact match).
Why these links exist
Every edge carries a method, confidence, and the source snippet that justified it — so bad links are debuggable.
- FuzzyOverlapping authors or contributors · 62%f/prompts.chat →
“Shared author/contributor keys: panda”
- FuzzyOverlapping authors or contributors · 62%open-webui/open-webui →
“Shared author/contributor keys: panda”
- LinkedLinked via arxiv author · 85%Paras Balani →
“Self-Referential Induction Increases Response Instability Relative to Unresolvable and Verifiable Questions in Large Lan”
- LinkedLinked via arxiv author · 85%Subhrakanta Panda →
“Self-Referential Induction Increases Response Instability Relative to Unresolvable and Verifiable Questions in Large Lan”
