Super Weights in LLMs and the Failure of Selective Training
Recent work identified Super Weights, individual parameters whose removal degrades model performance by orders of magnitude. We show that this degradation due to pruning Super Weights does not universally apply to all LLMs. Furthermore, if these parameters are so important, Super Weight-aware training should be effective. We show the opposite. Training Super Weights in isolation (100 to 8,192 parameters) drops accuracy to random-guessing levels on both OLMo-1B and OLMo-7B, and expanding to local neighborhoods of up to 36K parameters provides no improvement. The failure is specific to Super Wei
Lineage graph
Paper → model → repo connections mined from source citations (Tier-1 exact match).
Why these links exist
- Linked via arxiv authorShreyas Subramanian →
Super Weights in LLMs and the Failure of Selective Training
- Linked via arxiv authorAdewale Akinfaderin →
Super Weights in LLMs and the Failure of Selective Training
- Linked via arxiv authorAkarsha Sehwag →
Super Weights in LLMs and the Failure of Selective Training