The Effects of Synthetic Data and Label Distribution on Canola Branch Counting
Collecting annotated plant images for automated phenotyping is often slow and expensive. Plant models simulating growth and development can generate unlimited synthetic images with exact labels. However, previous work has established that whether incorporating synthetic data improves performance depends on the ratio of synthetic to real images and the label distribution of the synthetic dataset. To systematically quantify both factors, we train ResNet-18 models on a canola branch-counting task using a calibrated L-system plant model. We vary each factor independently. Synthetic-to-real ratios
Lineage graph
Paper → model → repo connections mined from source citations (Tier-1 exact match).
Why these links exist
Every edge carries a method, confidence, and the source snippet that justified it — so bad links are debuggable.
- LinkedLinked via arxiv author · 85%Amirsalar Darvishpour →
“The Effects of Synthetic Data and Label Distribution on Canola Branch Counting”
- LinkedLinked via arxiv author · 85%Mikolaj Cieslak →
“The Effects of Synthetic Data and Label Distribution on Canola Branch Counting”
- LinkedLinked via arxiv author · 85%Adam Runions →
“The Effects of Synthetic Data and Label Distribution on Canola Branch Counting”
