The Eticas AI Risk Taxonomy: Open Infrastructure for Operationalizing AI Audits
The rapid deployment of AI systems across high-stakes domains has created urgent demand for standardized evaluation, yet the field remains fragmented across competing risk taxonomies that catalog risks without showing how an audit is executed. At least 74 AI risk taxonomies exist, and almost all stop at the catalog. The hard part of auditing is not naming a risk but operationalizing it: turning it into a test run against a real system, a measured value, a calibrated severity, and a defensible grade. This paper leads with that bridge. We present the operationalization layer Eticas has built and
Lineage graph
Paper → model → repo connections mined from source citations (Tier-1 exact match).
Why these links exist
Every edge carries a method, confidence, and the source snippet that justified it — so bad links are debuggable.
- PossiblePossibly related (embedding) · 54%How Cara pioneers domain-specific AI for enterprise insurance brokerages with AWS →
- PossiblePossibly related (embedding) · 54%Helping build shared standards for advanced AI →
- PossiblePossibly related (embedding) · 53%Verisight →
- PossiblePossibly related (embedding) · 53%Supporting Europe’s work in ensuring a trustworthy AI ecosystem →
- PossiblePossibly related (embedding) · 51%langfuse/langfuse →
- PossiblePossibly related (embedding) · 46%ChristoAnsek/audited-change-gate →
- LinkedLinked via arxiv author · 85%Gemma Galdon Clavell →
“The Eticas AI Risk Taxonomy: Open Infrastructure for Operationalizing AI Audits”
- LinkedLinked via arxiv author · 85%Pablo Accuosto →
“The Eticas AI Risk Taxonomy: Open Infrastructure for Operationalizing AI Audits”