Read original ↗
paperarXivTrust 82 · PrimaryPublished yesterdayLive · 19h ago

The Grammar Does the Work: Functional vs. Lexical Dependency Length Minimization Across Universal Dependencies

Dependency length minimization (DLM) is a well-documented processing universal, but previous studies report a single mean dependency distance (MDD) per language, obscuring variation across syntactic relation types. We analyze 122 languages in UD and SUD (version 2.17), showing that DLM operates on two distinct levels. Grammar-driven optimization targets functional dependencies (det, case, aux), which are universally short (mean 1.71, $σ$ = 0.33) and invariant across typologically diverse languages. Processing-driven optimization operates on lexical dependencies (nsubj, obj, obl), which are lon

Lineage graph

Paper → model → repo connections mined from source citations (Tier-1 exact match).

Why these links exist

  • Linked via arxiv authorKim Gerdes

    The Grammar Does the Work: Functional vs. Lexical Dependency Length Minimization Across Universal Dependencies

Implements

authored (incoming)

Related across the graph

Topics