The Illusion of Equivalency: Statistical Characterization of Quantization Effects in LLMs
Post-training quantization is widely used to deploy large language models in resource-constrained settings, yet its evaluation relies almost exclusively on accuracy and perplexity. We show that these metrics fail to capture behavioral changes induced by quantization. We introduce correctness agreement, a decision-level metric that measures overlap in correct predictions between a base model and its quantized variants, independent of absolute accuracy. Across multiple models and quantization schemes from 8-bit to 2-bit, we find that behavioral divergence emerges under moderate quantization even
Lineage graph
Paper → model → repo connections mined from source citations (Tier-1 exact match).
Why these links exist
- Linked via arxiv authorBaha Rababah →
The Illusion of Equivalency: Statistical Characterization of Quantization Effects in LLMs
- Linked via arxiv authorCuneyt Gurcan Akcora →
The Illusion of Equivalency: Statistical Characterization of Quantization Effects in LLMs
- Linked via arxiv authorCarson K. Leung →
The Illusion of Equivalency: Statistical Characterization of Quantization Effects in LLMs
