The Invisible Editorial Layer: Formalizing Undisclosed Inference-Time Steering, Probability Placement, and the Attribution Problem in Deployed Language Models
Large language models (LLMs) are commonly evaluated under the assumption that their observable behavior is primarily determined by model weights, training data, alignment procedures, and user prompts. This view is incomplete. Modern inference pipelines may systematically modify the probability distribution produced by a model immediately before token selection, creating an additional layer of control between frozen weights and observed text. While controlled generation (e.g., PPLM, GeDi, DExperts, FUDGE) and text-watermarking systems (e.g., SynthID-Text) demonstrate the technical maturity of
Lineage graph
Paper → model → repo connections mined from source citations (Tier-1 exact match).
Why these links exist
Every edge carries a method, confidence, and the source snippet that justified it — so bad links are debuggable.
- PossiblePossibly related (embedding) · 56%Implementing Watermarking for Language Models [P] →
- PossiblePossibly related (embedding) · 53%Large language models as uncertainty-calibrated optimizers for experimental discovery →
- FuzzySimilar title/name (fuzzy) · 84%xorbitsai/inference →
“Fuzzy title match (0.92): “The Invisible Editorial Layer: Formalizing Undisclosed Infer” ≈ “xorbitsai/inference””
- LinkedLinked via arxiv author · 85%Augusto Camargo →
“The Invisible Editorial Layer: Formalizing Undisclosed Inference-Time Steering, Probability Placement, and the Attributi”
