Read original ↗
paperarXivTrust 82 · PrimaryPublished 1mo agoLive · 28d ago

The Label Complexity of Class-Conditional Coverage under Distribution Shift

Standard evaluation of many recognition systems contains distribution shift by construction, since benchmarks place disjoint conditions in the training and test splits. Under such a shift, split conformal prediction keeps marginal coverage near the nominal level while per-class coverage fails silently: on a real cross-subject skeleton benchmark, marginal coverage stays near ninety percent, the worst action class is covered about seventy percent of the time, and ten of the sixty classes fall below eighty percent coverage. We characterize the cost of restoring per-class validity. First, an imp

Lineage graph

Paper → model → repo connections mined from source citations (Tier-1 exact match).

Why these links exist

Every edge carries a method, confidence, and the source snippet that justified it — so bad links are debuggable.

  • FuzzyOverlapping authors or contributors · 62%janhq/jan

    Shared author/contributor keys: han

  • FuzzyOverlapping authors or contributors · 62%ultralytics/ultralytics

    Shared author/contributor keys: han

  • LinkedLinked via arxiv author · 85%Weijia Han

    The Label Complexity of Class-Conditional Coverage under Distribution Shift

  • LinkedLinked via arxiv author · 85%Lisha Qu

    The Label Complexity of Class-Conditional Coverage under Distribution Shift

Implements (incoming)

authored (incoming)

Related across the graph

Topics