Typological Feature Prediction with Large Language Models: An In-Context Learning Approach
Typological features are widely used in multilingual NLP, and the prediction of such features holds downstream utility. However, existing methods to predict missing values lack interpretable justifications for predictions, while their performance across resource levels and feature types remains underexplored. Given LLMs' abilities in meta-linguistic reasoning and in providing rationales, we investigate LLMs' performance in typological feature prediction via an in-context learning approach with linguistic data from URIEL+ and Glottolog. We find that zero-shot prompting is insufficient, but when
Lineage graph
Paper → model → repo connections mined from source citations (Tier-1 exact match).
Why these links exist
Every edge carries a method, confidence, and the source snippet that justified it — so bad links are debuggable.
- PossiblePossibly related (embedding) · 54%Implicit-bias-like patterns in reasoning models →
- PossiblePossibly related (embedding) · 53%Large Language Models: Qwen3 Offers AI Models For Deeper Reasoning And Faster Responses - Trend Hunter →
- FuzzySimilar title/name (fuzzy) · 84%amitness/learning →
“Fuzzy title match (0.92): “Typological Feature Prediction with Large Language Models: A” ≈ “amitness/learning””
- FuzzyOverlapping authors or contributors · 62%ray-project/ray →
“Shared author/contributor keys: wang”
- FuzzyOverlapping authors or contributors · 62%browser-use/browser-use →
“Shared author/contributor keys: lee”
- FuzzyOverlapping authors or contributors · 62%bytedance/deer-flow →
“Shared author/contributor keys: wang”
