When AI Blurs the Boundaries of Contribution: An Empirical Study of Authorship Calibration
The broad adoption of Artificial Intelligence (AI), especially Generative AI, raises pressing questions about how users interact with these systems to produce new content. In this paper, we introduce the concept of authorship calibration, defined as users awareness of their actual authorship when interacting with AI. Using the CoAuthor dataset, we empirically examine how authorship calibration varies across users and how it relates to their frequency of AI use. Our results reveal high variability: users relying heavily on AI tend to misjudge their authorship, whereas those using AI less freque
Lineage graph
Paper → model → repo connections mined from source citations (Tier-1 exact match).
Why these links exist
Every edge carries a method, confidence, and the source snippet that justified it — so bad links are debuggable.
- PossiblePossibly related (embedding) · 52%The fanfiction community is at war with AI — and itself →
- PossiblePossibly related (embedding) · 50%AI is forcing open-source projects to rethink their contributor rules - thestack.technology →
- PossiblePossibly related (embedding) · 49%devin-ai-integration[bot] →
- LinkedLinked via arxiv author · 85%Célina Treuillier →
“When AI Blurs the Boundaries of Contribution: An Empirical Study of Authorship Calibration”
- LinkedLinked via arxiv author · 85%Denis Lalanne →
“When AI Blurs the Boundaries of Contribution: An Empirical Study of Authorship Calibration”
- PossiblePossibly related (embedding) · 49%Substack adds an AI detector to help spot blogs written by no one →
- PossiblePossibly related (embedding) · 52%Substack’s new tool tells you who’s been writing their newsletters with AI →