When are likely answers right? On Sequence Probability and Correctness in LLMs
Many decoding methods for large language models can be understood as shifting probability mass toward outputs that are more likely under the model, either locally at the token level or globally at the sequence level. Therefore, their success depends on a fundamental question: when does sequence probability, that is, the conditional probability of a continuation given a prompt, actually align with correctness? In this paper, we set out to quantify this relationship across decoding methods, models, and benchmarks at four levels: across decoding methods, across hyperparameters within a method, ac
Lineage graph
Paper → model → repo connections mined from source citations (Tier-1 exact match).
Why these links exist
Every edge carries a method, confidence, and the source snippet that justified it — so bad links are debuggable.
- LinkedLinked via unknownTransformer →
- LinkedLinked via unknownKnowledge Distillation of Black-Box Large Language Models →
- LinkedLinked via unknownDSpark: Speculative decoding accelerates LLM inference [pdf] →
- PossiblePossibly related (embedding) · 52%edwardcapriolo/deliverance →
- PossiblePossibly related (embedding) · 58%thu-pacman/chitu →
- PossiblePossibly related (embedding) · 52%Jeryi-Sun/LLM-and-Law →
- PossiblePossibly related (embedding) · 45%Can We Understand How Large Language Models Reason? - Communications of the ACM →
- PossiblePossibly related (embedding) · 52%Evaluating J-space entropy as an error predictor across 7 datasets on Qwen3-4B [R] →
