repoGitHubTrust 82 · PrimaryPublished 24d agoLive · 21d ago

minghinmatthewlam/openbench

Same model, different wrapper: a from-scratch benchmark comparing coding-agent harnesses (codex, pi, opencode, cursor, devin) and open models on correctness, speed, and token cost

Lineage graph

Paper → model → repo connections mined from source citations (Tier-1 exact match).

Why these links exist

Every edge carries a method, confidence, and the source snippet that justified it — so bad links are debuggable.

PossiblePossibly related (embedding) · 62%Is it agentic enough? Benchmarking open models on your own tooling →
PossiblePossibly related (embedding) · 63%I built an open-source multi-agent SDLC harness that beats a cold Claude Code run on large repos, by learning the repo once. Real benchmarks (incl. where it loses) inside. [P] →
PossiblePossibly related (embedding) · 46%I want people here to open your eyes and note how Google did not sign the anti- open-source-model coalition →

Covers

newsIs it agentic enough? Benchmarking open models on your own tooling

Covers (incoming)

newsI built an open-source multi-agent SDLC harness that beats a cold Claude Code run on large repos, by learning the repo once. Real benchmarks (incl. where it loses) inside. [P]newsI want people here to open your eyes and note how Google did not sign the anti- open-source-model coalition

Related across the graph

Topics