newsReddit r/MachineLearningTrust 52 · CommunityPublished yesterdayLive · 15m ago
For the people who got reviews back from neurips, cvpr, eccv, etc and also tested their paper through an agentic reviewer like the stanford one, how different were the reviews? [D]
Hello, I was curious about the differences you can get from the human reviewers and the llms. Any insight is welcome, thank you! submitted by /u/obliviousphoenix2003 [link]
Why these links exist
Every edge carries a method, confidence, and the source snippet that justified it — so bad links are debuggable.
- PossiblePossibly related (embedding) · 53%Agent-Field/pr-af →
- PossiblePossibly related (embedding) · 52%ayoubinio01/llm-vs-rag-peer-review →
- PossiblePossibly related (embedding) · 47%golobokov.misha/llm-review-agents →