repoGitLabTrust 82 · PrimaryPublished 1mo agoLive · 1mo ago
golobokov.misha/llm-review-agents
LLM agents for code review.
Lineage graph
Paper → model → repo connections mined from source citations (Tier-1 exact match).
Why these links exist
Every edge carries a method, confidence, and the source snippet that justified it — so bad links are debuggable.
- PossiblePossibly related (embedding) · 48%AgentTrace →
- PossiblePossibly related (embedding) · 47%Are Performance-Optimization Benchmarks Reliably Measuring Coding Agents? →
- PossiblePossibly related (embedding) · 47%TraceLab: Characterizing Coding Agent Workloads for LLM Serving →
- PossiblePossibly related (embedding) · 46%SWE-Doctor: Guiding Software Engineering Agents with Runtime Diagnosis from Multi-Faceted Bug Reproduction Tests →
- PossiblePossibly related (embedding) · 46%[R] Compiling Agentic Workflows into LLM Weights: Near-Frontier Quality at Two Orders of Magnitude Less Cost →
- PossiblePossibly related (embedding) · 47%JPLoft Recognized as a Trusted LLM Development Company for Enterprise AI - The National Law Review →
Related to
Implements
Covers
Covers (incoming)
Related across the graph
paperAre Performance-Optimization Benchmarks Reliably Measuring Coding Agents?paperTraceLab: Characterizing Coding Agent Workloads for LLM ServingnewsJPLoft Recognized as a Trusted LLM Development Company for Enterprise AI - The National Law ReviewnewsFor the people who got reviews back from neurips, cvpr, eccv, etc and also tested their paper through an agentic reviewer like the stanford one, how different were the reviews? [D]paperSWE-Doctor: Guiding Software Engineering Agents with Runtime Diagnosis from Multi-Faceted Bug Reproduction Testsnews[R] Compiling Agentic Workflows into LLM Weights: Near-Frontier Quality at Two Orders of Magnitude Less CosttoolAgentTrace