Collective creativity in hybrid societies
Generative AI is changing how cultural artifacts are created and circulated, and with it our understanding of creativity itself. Researchers disagree about whether these tools enrich or impoverish culture, and we argue that much of that disagreement comes from conflating two distinct components of creativity: novelty, a property of single artifacts, and diversity, a property of populations. We argue further that creativity in the context of generative AI is best understood as a property of hybrid collectives, or populations of interacting people and algorithms, rather than of individuals. AI-a
Lineage graph
Paper → model → repo connections mined from source citations (Tier-1 exact match).
Why these links exist
Every edge carries a method, confidence, and the source snippet that justified it — so bad links are debuggable.
- PossiblePossibly related (embedding) · 58%Generative AI Is an Engineering Disaster - The Atlantic →
- PossiblePossibly related (embedding) · 55%The epistemic debt of generative AI →
- PossiblePossibly related (embedding) · 54%How AI can contribute to human cultural evolution - Max-Planck-Gesellschaft →
- PossiblePossibly related (embedding) · 54%Rodney Greenfield: "Human Intelligence Plus Artificial Intelligence" Elevates Creativity - Little Black Book | LBBOnline →
- LinkedLinked via arxiv author · 85%Mason Youngblood →
“Collective creativity in hybrid societies”
- LinkedLinked via arxiv author · 85%Katie Mudd →
“Collective creativity in hybrid societies”
- LinkedLinked via arxiv author · 85%Manuel Anglada-Tort →
“Collective creativity in hybrid societies”
- LinkedLinked via arxiv author · 85%Cameron Jones →
“Collective creativity in hybrid societies”